An advanced course in a topics area, such as, metaethics, contemporary European philosophy, or Social-Political Philosophy. Prerequisite: one course in philosophy or permission of instructor. May be repeated for credit with different topics.
| Distribution Area | Prerequisites | Credits |
|---|---|---|
| One course in philosophy or permission of instructor | 1 course |
What should we do after we, or our loved ones, have been wronged? After you have been abused, mistreated or suffered an injustice, or after your community has been subjected to an atrocity, how should you act towards the perpetrator(s)? Moral philosophers tell us that there is a natural and justified response to moral injury: resentment (or ressentiment), and that there are two options for how to move forward from there: to forgive the perpetrator; or to take revenge against them. Moral philosophers are also almost unanimously in favour of forgiveness and strongly against revenge. This course will explore these issues through engagement with the work of some classic philosophers (Nietzsche, Bacon, Butler and Arendt), as well as contemporary theorists of forgiveness and vengeance (Jeffrie Murphy, Peter French and Charles Griswold). We will explore the almost magical power of forgiveness to release us from an otherwise irreversibly ruined past, and the very real dangers of taking revenge. But we will also tackle difficult questions about the limits of forgiveness, whether forgiveness is possible in political or social-level wrongs, the possibility of unforgivable crimes, and some partial and wholehearted defences of vengeance. A note of caution: The class will involve a viewing of the hyper-violent Korean revenge film Old Boy, and readings from post-atrocity contexts such as the Holocaust, which students may find unpleasant or disturbing.
The practice of leading involves the use of interpersonal influence, which means that leadership has substantial ethical aspects "built in." Leadership must pursue socially elevating goals, and restrict collaborative teams to only good (or at least morally permissible) means to attain them. Leaders must resist various temptations to abuse their position, and their ability to influence others. Leadership tests moral character, and requires a commitment to consistently uphold shared values. It also requires respect, inclusivity and equitable treatment for all members of the team. This course offers students the core tools and concepts needed to grapple with the ethical questions at the heart of leadership. First, we study multiple moral frameworks needed to understand and practice ethical leadership. Then we will engage with case studies, and contemporary literature, considering ethical aspects of leadership including: privilege and diversity; gender and culture; unethical influence (coercion, exploitation and manipulation); bridging the gap between knowing something is wrong and actually speaking up against it; and whether leaders are ever right to make exceptions to practical principles or rules. (The course has no prerequisites, although students will be well served by having completed LEAD 228--Foundations of Leadership. It serves the Leadership minor, and may also count towards the major and minor in philosophy.)